Q: I’m a staff development specialist, which means I support teachers’ work and development but don’t evaluate them. I love my job and my relationships with my colleagues, but I’m often put in the uncomfortable position of knowing the principal or an assistant principal is making a wrong-headed assumption about what teachers want. I’m talking about simple but well-meaning and often easily fixable blunders. For instance, a teacher who spearheaded a new initiative recently confided that she wished the principal had publicly acknowledged her at a recent staff meeting. Meanwhile, the principal told me at the end of that meeting that he had wanted to say something but didn’t because he knew “how much she hates being in the spotlight.”
I don’t want to be the go-between all the time, but it’s frustrating to bear witness to this kind of miscommunication, especially when the resulting unhappiness is avoidable. I feel like speaking up helps everyone and can improve staff morale, and so I typically will share in these instances. But I worry that I’ll be perceived as the “messenger for the malcontents” and that my involvement could reflect negatively on me. Do you think I should continue to play this role?”
A: I think you’re wise to ask the question and tread carefully. In an ideal world, acting as the “go-between” wouldn’t be necessary because everyone would be communicating directly, honestly, and transparently with one another. In the real world, however, there are times when people need help conveying their preferences. The ongoing challenge for you will be to share your colleagues’ valid frustrations and feedback constructively, positively, non-confrontationally, and with their permission. The last thing you want is to strain your relationships with everyone — to lose teachers’ trust and be viewed as a relentless bearer of bad news. You also run the risk that you’ll inadvertently miscommunicate how others feel, even if you think you listened carefully and have clarity. Relatedly, keep in mind that if you’re hearing the same sentiment from multiple sources, there’s no need to single anyone out. Be judicious about which concerns you share, too. You should truly believe, for instance, that addressing them would benefit the organization.
You’ve accessed your three free articles for this month.
If you are a PDK member, login to read more.
If you are not a PDK member, join for full access, in addition to other benefits. Complete our membership form to join.
Forgot your password? Visit the Member Portal to reset your password.
Having trouble? Contact our member services team at memberservices@pdkintl.org or 800-766-1156.
